Democratic National Convention — looking back 40 years

Tuesday, August 19th, 2008

Forty years ago Hillary Rodham was still an undergraduate at Wellesley College, John McCain was in the Hanoi Hilton after being shot down the previous October, and Barack Obama had just turned eight and was attending elementary school in Jakarta, Indonesia.

The hot summer had brought to full force one of the most tumultuous times of political history.  Vietnam was becoming increasingly an unpopular war and although Lyndon B. Johnson had chosen not to run for re-election, many felt that his Vice President, Hubert Humphrey and presidential front runner, was equally to blame for the carnage in southeastern Asia.  The anti-war movement had been planning since March and included such groups as Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), Youth International Party (YIPPES), and National Mobilization Committee to End War in Vietnam.

The war was not the only stress felt by the country.  Civil rights riots had broken out in the spring following the assassination of Martin Luther King in Memphis, Tennessee.  One of King’s most visible supporters was Democratic Presidential Nominee, Bobby Kennedy, who had been killed in Los Angeles in July by a mentally ill Palestinian, Sirhan, Sirhan.The atmosphere was tender dry and lay waiting for the one spark to ignite the blaze which would forever transform the U.S. political process.

Friendly Fire May Bomb Obama

Sunday, March 23rd, 2008

The Easter sermon from Barack Obama’s Trinity United Church of Christ condemned the press for “lynching” the former pastor Jeremiah Wright.

Sunday’s sunrise sermon, delivered by Rev. Otis Moss III, was called “How to Handle a Public Lynching” and focused primarily on the media firestorm that has focused international attention on this Chicago ministry, which is the church attended by the Democratic presidential candidate.

Read the entire story: In Easter Sermon, Trinity United Pastor Compares Wright to Jesus

This is the type of inflammatory language that caused Obama to have to distance himself from Wright, his mentor and pastor for 20 years. Reverend Moss seems intent on continuing the rhetoric that has caused many moderate black and white supporters to rethink their opinion of the candidate.

“No one should start a ministry with lynching, no one should end their ministry with lynching. The lynching was national news.”

The repeated use of a term so often associated with segregation and racism is an obvious attempt to add more fuel to a story which had been almost tamped out by the end of the week with Bill Richardson’s endorsement of Obama. Today’s sermon will serve as gasoline on the embers of the story that is only a negative to the Illinois Senator’s campaign.

Moss seemed most concerned with retribution for the way in which Wright has been treated by the press, and particularly ironic was his specific reference to NPR. Not satisfied with whipping up his congregation by his lynching comments, he made the ultimate martyrdom analogy by comparing Wright’s recent tribulations to the sacrifice of Jesus.

“In order to crucify him you’ve got to lift him up … he had more visibility on the cross than he did during his entire ministry.”

And continuing the Easter metaphor, the passing of the offering plate was punctuated by the need to finance a crusade to battle against the defamation of the church.

Moss issued several pleas to congregants to donate to what he called the “Resurrection Fund,” stressing that during this time of battle, money is needed to defend the church.

This latest diatribe of racism from Obama’s church will no doubt cause another round of unwanted negative attention and damage control for the candidate. Is it possible that his campaign will be mortally wounded not from the Clinton machine but from his own Judas church?

You Tube Video of Sermon

Feminism’s dirty little secret

Saturday, March 8th, 2008

Very few successful women have ever publicly declared themselves as feminists. Like many African America men, they resent the stigma that any preferential treatment might bring. Self-motivated women want to compete on a level playing field, not one that has been artificially tipped in their favor based on chromosomal configuration.

Other, less diligent women have found the feminist agenda to be the perfect agenda to try to propel themselves to coveted, but undeserved positions. Grievances of sexual harassment cause the males to avoid even the most innocent of conversations, and if advancements are not handed out upon demand, charges of discrimination become the ticket to a better office and bigger perks. Sexuality is no longer the easiest way up the corporate lawyer; a good lawyer will make the ascension even faster.

The floundering Clinton campaign was shook to its core by the dinosaur of feminism, Gloria Steinem, whose remarks caused even the most liberal of HRC’s supporters to cringe with embarrassment. Like the mastodons, the age of angry bra-burners has hopefully entered the twilight. Just as the prehistoric beasts could not survive the changing environment of earth, women who depend on feminist ideals will not emerge as the cream of the evolutionary churn.

Katherine Jean Lopez examines the Impending Death of Feminism for Townhall.com

Enough is enough. Hillary Clinton has made history already; she has shown us that a woman can be a major presidential candidate. But as we are here living history, I’d like it to now be history.

Simply put, I don’t want a woman president. Not if she’s running to be a “woman president” and not the leader of the United States.

I’m deeply grateful to my junior senator. Her defeat this year would be a significant milestone for American women: The death of the feminist movement. It would mark the end of the silly-women-talk on the national political scene. The beginning of female candidates running as candidates, without a heavy serving of identity politics.

Lopez specifically points to the case of the resignation of Clinton campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle.

The great feminist lie was exposed when Clinton campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle quit after some 16 years with the senator, using the excuse of her 6-year-old son. As the story goes, upon returning home after two months on the campaign trail, her son rejected her. “I want Daddy,” he insisted. Solis Doyle broke out in tears and announced to her husband, “Joey doesn’t want me. … I’m quitting.”

Few believe Joey was the only reason she quit. She left the campaign in a state of disarray, with reports of internal fighting and a dire outlook. But she did quit, and with a spotlight on her son, she revealed more than the sisterhood would have liked. America is ready to quit this feminist silliness that men and women are equal, and that women don’t have different, natural responsibilities to the children they give birth to than men do.

Did Doyle finally realize the deception of feminism? After being told that women “can have it all,” did Doyle realize that having it all means leaving much unrealized? Many woman have found out the deception of feminism; that not all men are chauvinists and being a mother and wife is not without its own rewards. And finally, that personal success comes from within and not from manipulation, deceit, and personal compromise.

Waiting for AL Gore

Tuesday, February 12th, 2008

There is an old saying: “paybacks are hell.” The Clinton ticket must be re-examining the importance of this adage regularly as they wait for the answer: will he or won’t he?

The “he,” of course, is Al Gore, the Vice President, in name only, of the original Clinton presidency. He was overshadowed by an unelected, but highly motivated, first lady who all but assumed the VP’s duties during Bill’s term. In some respects, such as health care, Al was probably happy to see her take the heat. But at some time his pride must have been trampled. And if not his, Tipper’s for sure.

Old scores and new opportunities are examined in the Daily News article today entitled:

An inconvenient feud

Democratic insiders agree that Al Gore is the ultimate prize among uncommitted superdelegates, and Clintonistas well understand a Barack Obama endorsement by Bill Clinton’s veep would be a huge blow to Hillary.

They’re hoping Gore will stay on the sidelines, but shudder over reports Obama has been courting Prince Albert for months.

It has been widely reported that Gore has no lost love for the Clintons and places his defeat in 2000 at the feet of the outgoing first couple. Even six year’s after Gore lost to Bush, Mrs. Gore still held hopes for retribution against Hillary’s penchant for upstaging Al during a 2006 ABC interview.

Former second lady Tipper Gore is urging her husband, Al, to challenge Hillary Clinton for the 2008 presidential nomination – in what may be a score-settling move against the woman Mrs. Gore has long regarded as “difficult” and overly ambitious.

“Hillary thinks that Tipper is an unintellectual, nice lady who doesn’t have a brain in her head,” a Clinton aide claimed. “Tipper thinks Hillary’s an ambitious, rather uncoordinated, grasping, difficult woman,” a Gore insider countered.

The rift between Mrs. Clinton and Mrs. Gore grew much worse after President Clinton admitted he carried on a White House affair with a 23-year-old intern.

Sally Bedell Smith’s book, For Love of Politics — Bill and Hillary Clinton: The White House Years, details the decline of the Clinton Gore relationship that started almost immediately after the inauguration in 1993.

So to what degree is HRC willing to go to try to mend fences with the Gores, if it is even possible. If not, will Al sit on the sidelines or reap some revenge by throwing his endorsement to Obama.

One might wonder which is more satisfying to Algore: winning the most prestigious award of all, the Nobel Peace Prize, or watching Hillary squirm with uncertainty and speculating if any amount of groveling would mend any fences.

“Revenge is a dish best served cold”

“Caroline, no”

Sunday, January 27th, 2008

caroline-hrc.jpgHRC doesn’t sing in public, but today she must have been thinking of the Beach Boy’s lovely ballad when the princess of Camelot threw her impressive legacy to Barack Obama.

Caroline Kennedy said she is backing Obama because he offers the same uplifting message of hope and change that her father did when he ran for president in 1960.

Read full story

Quite a painful piece of reality for the would-be first couple in their quest for Clintonlot.

Later Uncle Teddy also threw his water-wings to Obama. In hindsight, perhaps one endorsement cancels out the other.

Keeping Score(s): Barack 12,500+, Clinton 0

Saturday, January 26th, 2008

What

is wrong

with this

picture?

Tony Rezko 53,businessman; indicted for extortion, fraud
Election Picks
19 wins,17 losses
$11,065 Republican
$61,750 Democrat
$1,000 Independent
total: $73,815

Hillary has attacked Barack Obama’s association with Rezko, and denies remembering the above photo op with him. Did Rezko’s shady past make him unremarkable to her? Based on the number of unsavory characters that HRC has been associated, probably not. Maybe the reason for her lapse of memory was Rezko’s lack of contributions to her campaign.

For more information on who contributes what to whom, visit www.newsmeat.com